Wrangler Riggs Workwear Men's Carpenter Jean
|
海外自营
广告
价格: |
¥300.13
会员0门槛免运费,查看详情。非会员满300元免运费。
|
![]() |
促销信息
Prime专享折扣 商品满1件可享8%的折扣。
共1个促销
-
Prime专享折扣 商品满1件可享8%的折扣。
Prime专享折扣 [Prime会员专享]购买亚马逊海外购活动商品满1件,即可享受售价9.2折优惠。 点击查看全部参加活动商品 如何获得促销优惠 (促销说明)已领优惠码

购买海外购商品需要提供身份证信息用于清关(清关时间延长有可能影响部分订单的实际送达日期)。了解更多。 |
提升您的购买力
- 版型: 宽松
- 腰围样式: 中腰
- 裤腿类型: 直筒
- 面料类型: 100% 棉
- 样式: Carpenter 牛仔裤
- ROOM2MOVE 舒适。 长时间工作,你想要一款舒适的工作牛仔裤。 这款裤子采用休闲版型设计,裆部采用三角形裆部和深前口袋设计,增加运动范围和舒适度。
- 经典木匠风格。 这款经典木工牛仔裤采用正宗木工风格设计,非常适合任何木工或工匠。 耐用的材料和工具口袋细节让您在工作场所得到保护并*率。
- 全天舒适。 这款耐穿的木工牛仔裤采用 * 棉Durashield 牛仔布制成,全天保持舒适,可经受任何任务。
- 重型结构。 这些工作牛仔裤在应力点处采用持久加固 - 加固卷尺夹、腰带环和后袋,内衬有 7.5 盎司白色口袋,
- 实用存储。 配有 (2) 个斜插口袋,(2) 个后口袋,(2) 个右腿实用口袋,(1) 个左腿上的锤环,这些木工牛仔裤让您轻松拿取工具。
亚马逊海外购
- 由境外网站所在的原销售地的品牌商提供售后保修,可能不覆盖中国,详询品牌商售后。
- 购买海外购商品需要提供身份证信息用于清关(清关时间延长有可能影响部分订单的实际送达日期)。
- 商品的尺码/适龄/标签和说明书的语言等可能与本地不同。了解更多
购买此商品的顾客也同时购买
第 1 页, 共 1 页第一页第 1 页, 共 1 页
-
Wrangler RIGGS WORKWEAR Men's Big & Tall Carpenter Short库存中仅剩 5 件(更多商品正在运送途中)。
生产商提供信息
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Wrangler RIGGS WORKWEAR Ranger Pant | Wrangler RIGGS WORKWER Carpenter Jean | Wrangler RIGGS WORKWEAR Utility Jean | Wrangler RIGGS WORKWEAR Work Horse Jean | Wrangler RIGGS WORKWEAR Relaxed Fit Jean | Wrangler RIGGS WORKWEAR Contractor Jean | |
Natural Waist Rise | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
Relaxed Fit | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
Pocket Styling | 7 Pocket Cargo Styling | 6 Pocket Carpenter Styling | 6 Pocket Utility Styling | 5 Pocket Styling | 5 Pocket Styling | 7 Pocket Utility Styling |
Leg Opening | Straight Leg | Straight Leg | Straight Leg | Straight Leg | Straight Leg | Straight Leg |
Fits Over Boots | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
Fabric Content | 100% Cotton durashield Denim or 100% Cotton Ripstop | 100% Cotton durashield Denim or 100% Cotton Ripstop | 100% Cotton durashield Denim or 100% Cotton Ripstop | 100% Cotton durashield Denim or 100% Cotton Ripstop | 100% Cotton durashield Denim or 100% Cotton Ripstop | 100% Cotton durashield Denim or 100% Cotton Ripstop |
Exclusive RIGGS Features | CORDURA Fabric Lined Back Pockets, room2move Fit, Action Gusset, & Leather Tape Measure Reinforcement | CORDURA Fabric Lined Back Pockets, room2move Fit, Action Gusset, & Leather Tape Measure Reinforcement | CORDURA Fabric Lined Back Pockets, room2move Fit, Action Gusset, & Leather Tape Measure Reinforcement | CORDURA Fabric Lined Back Pockets, room2move Fit, Action Gusset, & Leather Tape Measure Reinforcement | CORDURA Fabric Lined Back Pockets, room2move Fit, Action Gusset, & Leather Tape Measure Reinforcement | CORDURA Fabric Lined Back Pockets, room2move Fit, Action Gusset, & Leather Tape Measure Reinforcement |
Special Features | Reinforced Knees, Dirt Drop Vent, Side Cargo Pockets, & Hammer Loop | Tool Pocket & Hammer Loop | Tool Pocket, Cell Phone Pocket & Hammer Loop | Hammer Loop | Oversized Watch Pocket | Tool Pockets, Utility Loop & Cell Phone Pocket |
买家评论
5.0 颗星,最多 5 颗星
5,满分5
1评级
评级是如何计算的?
在计算总星级评分以及按星级确定的百分比时,我们不使用简单的平均值。相反,我们的系统会考虑评论的最新程度以及评论者是否在亚马逊上购买了该商品。系统还会分析评论,验证评论的可信度。
此商品在美国亚马逊上最有用的商品评论
美国亚马逊:
4.2 颗星,最多 5 颗星
2,626 条评论

Amazon Customer
3.0 颗星,最多 5 颗星
Ehhh....not as good as I originally thought
2018年8月9日 -
已在美国亚马逊上发表已确认购买
This is my second review and a follow-up to my first review. I originally gave these pants a four-star rating, but now I’m dropping that to three stars.
I said before that the pants were holding up well under all of my workloads (facilities maintenance), but almost as if it were divine intervention— the pants have started to show a lack in durability since posting my last review.
Don’t get me wrong. For the price point that I paid (about $25-$30 per pair), they still aren’t too bad. But I am going on about four months now of wearing three pairs interchangeably, and they are starting to exponentially wear out.
On one pair, I had a bush branch poke a hole through the calf portion of the the right leg. The hole has continuously gotten bigger and bigger with each passing day. These pants are certainly not true “ripstop” pants, though they look like it at a glance.
On all three pairs, I have seam threads coming apart at all of the pockets, but especially the back pockets.
I was definitely hoping to see at least a good six months before seeing these signs of wear, but I do understand the mantra— you get what you pay for.
I still have the same opinions of the hammer loop. I never use it. I never see anyone else consistently use it. I still believe that the left-leg pocket should be slightly deeper, and there should be an identical pocket on the right leg, replacing the hammer loop.
Hopefully, I won’t feel the need to come bump these down again to two stars in the future. However, whether I do that or not, I don’t think I will purchase these pants again. In the trades, every dollar you spend replacing/repairing your tools, equipment, and even clothing, is a dollar you don’t get to take home to your family.
Next time, I think I will just buy once, and cry once.
I said before that the pants were holding up well under all of my workloads (facilities maintenance), but almost as if it were divine intervention— the pants have started to show a lack in durability since posting my last review.
Don’t get me wrong. For the price point that I paid (about $25-$30 per pair), they still aren’t too bad. But I am going on about four months now of wearing three pairs interchangeably, and they are starting to exponentially wear out.
On one pair, I had a bush branch poke a hole through the calf portion of the the right leg. The hole has continuously gotten bigger and bigger with each passing day. These pants are certainly not true “ripstop” pants, though they look like it at a glance.
On all three pairs, I have seam threads coming apart at all of the pockets, but especially the back pockets.
I was definitely hoping to see at least a good six months before seeing these signs of wear, but I do understand the mantra— you get what you pay for.
I still have the same opinions of the hammer loop. I never use it. I never see anyone else consistently use it. I still believe that the left-leg pocket should be slightly deeper, and there should be an identical pocket on the right leg, replacing the hammer loop.
Hopefully, I won’t feel the need to come bump these down again to two stars in the future. However, whether I do that or not, I don’t think I will purchase these pants again. In the trades, every dollar you spend replacing/repairing your tools, equipment, and even clothing, is a dollar you don’t get to take home to your family.
Next time, I think I will just buy once, and cry once.
25 个人发现此评论有用

techs
3.0 颗星,最多 5 颗星
not the same pants...
2018年12月21日 -
已在美国亚马逊上发表已确认购买
Riggs Workwear Carpenter Jeans have been my every day pants for decades — FIVE STARS. The last pair I bought had dropped two belt loops off the back, so anything you carry on your belt slides around to the small of your back instead of staying where you put it behind your hip (and they will bunch up funny if you use a belt to cinch up winter pants in the summer).
This purchase has that problem plus — the inseam is smaller, the waist is smaller, the rise is shorter, the zipper is shorter. Not enough to make it seem like an incorrect size label, but like the pattern or the quality control has changed along with some of the detail work. Just enough that they don't really fit well. The most comfortable pants ever may have become barely tolerable.
Update: It's not quality control. I've spent the past three months waiting for an exchange or explanation from Wrangler. They too pants back and sent a replacement pair, but no explanation. They measure exactly the same, and are wrong in exactly the same ways. Apparently Wrangler has just decided to make them wrong. Old 32s still fit well but are no longer presentable; new 32s I can't zip or button or bend over. Old 34s fall off my hips, but I'm still deciding whether to spend the time and money to see whether larger pants will work.
This purchase has that problem plus — the inseam is smaller, the waist is smaller, the rise is shorter, the zipper is shorter. Not enough to make it seem like an incorrect size label, but like the pattern or the quality control has changed along with some of the detail work. Just enough that they don't really fit well. The most comfortable pants ever may have become barely tolerable.
Update: It's not quality control. I've spent the past three months waiting for an exchange or explanation from Wrangler. They too pants back and sent a replacement pair, but no explanation. They measure exactly the same, and are wrong in exactly the same ways. Apparently Wrangler has just decided to make them wrong. Old 32s still fit well but are no longer presentable; new 32s I can't zip or button or bend over. Old 34s fall off my hips, but I'm still deciding whether to spend the time and money to see whether larger pants will work.
11 个人发现此评论有用

Jason W.
2.0 颗星,最多 5 颗星
Quality materials, but the fit is absolutely terrible for anyone with human proportions.
2018年6月11日 -
已在美国亚马逊上发表已确认购买
The quality of the construction seems fine, but the design of the fit is absolutely horrible.
Previously, I tried a 34x36 (my usual pant size, i'm 6'6" @ 205lbs) and I couldn't even get the waist to close on the pants, but everything else looked like it would have fit correctly. This time I tried ordering the next size up - 36x36. It was like some kind of bad joke pant, the waist fit loose enough I could pull the pants down without unsnapping them, and the legs looked like MC Hammer pants from the 90s... could have fit three of my legs in them.
Previously, I tried a 34x36 (my usual pant size, i'm 6'6" @ 205lbs) and I couldn't even get the waist to close on the pants, but everything else looked like it would have fit correctly. This time I tried ordering the next size up - 36x36. It was like some kind of bad joke pant, the waist fit loose enough I could pull the pants down without unsnapping them, and the legs looked like MC Hammer pants from the 90s... could have fit three of my legs in them.
12 个人发现此评论有用

tdk
1.0 颗星,最多 5 颗星
Fit is aweful, pants are made well.
2020年11月14日 -
已在美国亚马逊上发表已确认购买
Note: I would give this 3 stars, but nobody reads 3 star reviews and I am trying to help people understand how they fit. Design wise, these are great pants. I wear a tape measure often and the reinforced pocket is perfect. I would add more pockets on the legs for pencils, tools, etc. ON FIT - I am slim from the waist down (belly not withstanding!) I bought 3 pair of 33/32 in various colors. These pants fit perfect at the waist when standing, but the waist gets pretty tight when bending, stooping, or sitting; and there is no give/stretch at all in the waist. I found myself uncomfortable and constantly pulling at the top button. Normally, I would just buy the next size up and wear a belt, but the problem is that I could fit two of my legs in one leg hole of these pants. My legs are swimming around in all the extra material. If you have thighs nearly as big as your waist, these will be great for you... but, for those of us that are not body building our thighs and calves, these are like parachute pants from the 80s. They also seem to run a little long.
3 个人发现此评论有用

T. Mark Graham
4.0 颗星,最多 5 颗星
but not nearly as bad as the shorts version
2017年8月12日 -
已在美国亚马逊上发表已确认购买
A little tight in thigh, but not nearly as bad as the shorts version. The point of pockets is to put things in them. If putting things in the pocket makes it so tight that one cannot retrieve anything from the pockets, it defeats the purpose. I was looking for a cooler, lighter weight alternative to the relaxed fit Wrangler Jeans. These are okay, but apparently some designer is confusing "work pants" with "check out my tight butt at the disco".
15 个人发现此评论有用