Brand | Samsung 三星 |
---|---|
制造商 | Samsung Electronics DAV |
型号 | 970 EVO |
商品尺寸 | 2.21 x 8 x 2.29 cm; 50 克 |
电池 | 1 锂离子电池 需要电池。 |
Is Discontinued By Manufacturer | 不是 |
颜色 | 黑色/红色 |
硬盘容量 | 1 TB |
瓦数 | 1000 |
操作系统 | Windows 10 Built 10240 |
是否包含电池 | 不是 |
锂电池容量 | 6 瓦時 |
电池包装类型 | 电池是包含在该商品的包装内,但没有装配在该商品内 |
电池锂含量 | 1.2 克 |
锂离子的数量 | 2 |
商品重量 | 50 g |
Samsung 三星 (MZ-V7E1T0BW) 970 EVO SSD 1TB - M.2 NVMe 接口内置固态硬盘 采用V-NAND 技术,黑色/红色
页面含机器翻译,中文仅供参考,以原文为准
|
海外自营
广告
价格: |
¥892.70
会员0门槛免运费,查看详情。非会员满300元免运费。
|
![]() |
促销信息
买满2件售价9.5折优惠。
共1个促销
-
买满2件售价9.5折优惠。
购买亚马逊海外购活动商品满2件,即可享受售价9.5折优惠。 点击查看全部参加活动商品 由 亚马逊美国 提供。 如何获得促销优惠 (促销说明)已领优惠码
- 采用三星行业领先的 V-NAND 技术制造,具有可靠和卓越的性能
- 读取速度高达 3,500MB/秒 *,出色的耐久性高达 1,200 TBW *(* 可能因容量而异)
- Samsung Magician 软件无缝克隆和文件传输,这是实现性能优化和数据安全的理想的固态硬盘管理解决方案,通过自动固件更新
- 三星的动态散热防护装置可降低过热风险,并减少性能下降。支持的功能是修剪所需的操作系统支持,垃圾回收和 s.m.a.r.t
- NVMe 接口 (PCIe M.2 2280) 提供增强的带宽、低延迟和电源效率,非常适合技术爱好者、高端玩家和 4K 和 3D 内容设计者。可靠性 (MTBF):150 万小时可靠性
亚马逊海外购
- 由境外网站所在的原销售地的品牌商提供售后保修,可能不覆盖中国,详询品牌商售后。
- 购买海外购商品需要提供身份证信息用于清关(清关时间延长有可能影响部分订单的实际送达日期)。
- 商品的尺码/适龄/标签和说明书的语言等可能与本地不同。了解更多
经常一起购买的商品
有问题吗?
搜索商品信息、问答、评论 ...
您的问题可能由卖家、制造商或购买此商品的客户来回答。
请确保您输入的问题有效。您可以编辑您的问题或直接发布。
请输入问题。
产品信息
容量:1 TB技术细节
更多信息
ASIN | B07BN217QG |
---|---|
用户评分 |
4.0 颗星,最多 5 颗星 |
亚马逊热销商品排名 |
商品里排第3,063名电脑\IT (查看商品销售排行榜电脑\IT)
商品里排第158名内置固态硬盘 |
Amazon.cn上架时间 | 2018年5月25日 |
我来补充
商品描述
容量:1 TB
三星 970 EVO 继续以 V-NAND 技术引领行业标准,提供可靠和卓越的性能。加速进入下一代运算,读取速度高达 3 500MB/s *,具有高达 1,200 TBW * 的卓越耐久性。体验更优化的固态硬盘。* 可能因容量而异; 工作温度:0-70 摄氏度。震动-1500 克和 0.5 毫秒(半正弦值)
买家评论
4.0 颗星,最多 5 颗星
4,满分5
1
买家评价
评级是如何计算的?
在计算总星级评分以及按星级确定的百分比时,我们不使用简单的平均值。相反,我们的系统会考虑评论的最新程度以及评论者是否在亚马逊上购买了该商品。系统还会分析评论,验证评论的可信度。
此商品在美国亚马逊上最有用的商品评论
美国亚马逊:
4.8 颗星,最多 5 颗星
3,740 条评论

Sanborn
5.0 颗星,最多 5 颗星
Most users will gain 0 benefit over less expensive ssd.
2018年11月4日 -
已在美国亚马逊上发表容量: 500 GB已确认购买
I was super excited to get this, I'm a mostly hardcore gamer with a 144Hz Gsync that is sensitive to input delay and refresh rates. I expected my socks to be knocked off the first time my PC booted and I did some general task stuff. Honestly? You can benchmark all you want, but there is 0 perceivable difference between an nvme and a Sata3 SSD outside of moving gigantic files.
Your games will maybe load 1 second faster. OS maybe boots slightly faster, but who does that?
The only thing I can objectively tell is different is I can move and delete huge files instantly. Perhaps it is more effective for someone who is doing 4K video editing.
If you're a gamer or just average user, just buy a regular SSD. Trust me.
Your games will maybe load 1 second faster. OS maybe boots slightly faster, but who does that?
The only thing I can objectively tell is different is I can move and delete huge files instantly. Perhaps it is more effective for someone who is doing 4K video editing.
If you're a gamer or just average user, just buy a regular SSD. Trust me.
1,006 个人发现此评论有用

Joñes
5.0 颗星,最多 5 颗星
How far we've come!
2018年5月10日 -
已在美国亚马逊上发表容量: 500 GB已确认购买
Amazing technology. I wanted the 960 series so bad but kept waiting for a price drop that never came. Now with the newer and better 970 series, I pulled the trigger and purchased one. This is the first time I've actually got my hands on an NVMe drive. I always thought they were about the size of RAM, but they are closer to a stick of gum in size. I can't believe how small they are. Installation is easy as long as you can get to it. In my case it's between PCIe slots so I had to remove my graphics card to install it. The BIOS saw it right away, then I simply used free partition-copying software to transfer the logical partitions and MBR to from my 750 EVO to my new 970. Then I set BIOS to boot from the new "stick of gum" and disabled the others. As a final step I removed drive letters from the two reserved partitions on the boot drive and reformatted the old boot drive to a blank GPT. I can definitively tell a difference when loading applications with a large footprint compared to the SATA-based SSD. I was hoping to see a noticeable difference in boot-time-to-desktop, but it's hard to tell. But when moving from Samsung SSD to faster Samsung SSD, trying to notice time savings is like splitting hairs. At this price point the drive is worth every penny.
Edit: Included a benchmark. 2,759 MB/sec write, and 2,313 MB/sec read. If you remember 3.5" floppies, this is like reading 1915 diskettes every second.
Edit2: After realizing that I wasn't getting the rated speed (which no one will probably actually see), I started to look into it and I made sure that I had the latest BIOS update, the latest chipset and storage drivers, and the Samsung NVME driver. After doing all that, I re-ran the benchmark and now I'm over the 3000 MB/sec mark! It's fast out of the box but with proper setup it can be much faster!
Edit: Included a benchmark. 2,759 MB/sec write, and 2,313 MB/sec read. If you remember 3.5" floppies, this is like reading 1915 diskettes every second.
Edit2: After realizing that I wasn't getting the rated speed (which no one will probably actually see), I started to look into it and I made sure that I had the latest BIOS update, the latest chipset and storage drivers, and the Samsung NVME driver. After doing all that, I re-ran the benchmark and now I'm over the 3000 MB/sec mark! It's fast out of the box but with proper setup it can be much faster!

5.0 颗星,最多 5 颗星
How far we've come!
2018年5月10日 在美国审核
Amazing technology. I wanted the 960 series so bad but kept waiting for a price drop that never came. Now with the newer and better 970 series, I pulled the trigger and purchased one. This is the first time I've actually got my hands on an NVMe drive. I always thought they were about the size of RAM, but they are closer to a stick of gum in size. I can't believe how small they are. Installation is easy as long as you can get to it. In my case it's between PCIe slots so I had to remove my graphics card to install it. The BIOS saw it right away, then I simply used free partition-copying software to transfer the logical partitions and MBR to from my 750 EVO to my new 970. Then I set BIOS to boot from the new "stick of gum" and disabled the others. As a final step I removed drive letters from the two reserved partitions on the boot drive and reformatted the old boot drive to a blank GPT. I can definitively tell a difference when loading applications with a large footprint compared to the SATA-based SSD. I was hoping to see a noticeable difference in boot-time-to-desktop, but it's hard to tell. But when moving from Samsung SSD to faster Samsung SSD, trying to notice time savings is like splitting hairs. At this price point the drive is worth every penny.2018年5月10日 在美国审核
Edit: Included a benchmark. 2,759 MB/sec write, and 2,313 MB/sec read. If you remember 3.5" floppies, this is like reading 1915 diskettes every second.
Edit2: After realizing that I wasn't getting the rated speed (which no one will probably actually see), I started to look into it and I made sure that I had the latest BIOS update, the latest chipset and storage drivers, and the Samsung NVME driver. After doing all that, I re-ran the benchmark and now I'm over the 3000 MB/sec mark! It's fast out of the box but with proper setup it can be much faster!
该评价的图片


634 个人发现此评论有用

Nate in Florida
5.0 颗星,最多 5 颗星
Better then expected!
2018年5月22日 -
已在美国亚马逊上发表容量: 500 GB已确认购买
Edit 30 March 2019:
well, the usual Samsung witchcraft ensued after a few months of use. Contrary to what the benchmark test still says this drive is now as slow and unresponsive as the Kingston drive that I have since thrown away. it's mojo and badassery dissappeared after an update installed. It's still a cool little drive but it looks like it's been throttled back possibly due to faster drives being in the works.
Original review:
so far so good. I had a pre installed Kingston m.2 sata drive in my MSI gaming laptop and it did the job, just not very quickly. After cloning my system over to the 970 EVO I was eager to see the difference in speed. To my surprise the boot time didn't really change, it might be half a second faster, so little I began to wonder if the price was worth it. I decided to open Adobe Lightroom as that is what I primarily use this computer for. I had processed a batch of photos with the old drive and it had taken roughly 5 minutes to finish. I processed the same batch with the 970 EVO and it blew my mind, 45 seconds from import to batch adjustment and export. I am so happy with this drive, my photography work will happen so much quicker now.
Attaching the CrystalMark scores for both my old Kingston and the 970 EVO. I was hesitant to spend this much on a drive but now I can't wait to upgrade my desktop with one of these.
well, the usual Samsung witchcraft ensued after a few months of use. Contrary to what the benchmark test still says this drive is now as slow and unresponsive as the Kingston drive that I have since thrown away. it's mojo and badassery dissappeared after an update installed. It's still a cool little drive but it looks like it's been throttled back possibly due to faster drives being in the works.
Original review:
so far so good. I had a pre installed Kingston m.2 sata drive in my MSI gaming laptop and it did the job, just not very quickly. After cloning my system over to the 970 EVO I was eager to see the difference in speed. To my surprise the boot time didn't really change, it might be half a second faster, so little I began to wonder if the price was worth it. I decided to open Adobe Lightroom as that is what I primarily use this computer for. I had processed a batch of photos with the old drive and it had taken roughly 5 minutes to finish. I processed the same batch with the 970 EVO and it blew my mind, 45 seconds from import to batch adjustment and export. I am so happy with this drive, my photography work will happen so much quicker now.
Attaching the CrystalMark scores for both my old Kingston and the 970 EVO. I was hesitant to spend this much on a drive but now I can't wait to upgrade my desktop with one of these.

5.0 颗星,最多 5 颗星
Better then expected!
2018年5月22日 在美国审核
Edit 30 March 2019:2018年5月22日 在美国审核
well, the usual Samsung witchcraft ensued after a few months of use. Contrary to what the benchmark test still says this drive is now as slow and unresponsive as the Kingston drive that I have since thrown away. it's mojo and badassery dissappeared after an update installed. It's still a cool little drive but it looks like it's been throttled back possibly due to faster drives being in the works.
Original review:
so far so good. I had a pre installed Kingston m.2 sata drive in my MSI gaming laptop and it did the job, just not very quickly. After cloning my system over to the 970 EVO I was eager to see the difference in speed. To my surprise the boot time didn't really change, it might be half a second faster, so little I began to wonder if the price was worth it. I decided to open Adobe Lightroom as that is what I primarily use this computer for. I had processed a batch of photos with the old drive and it had taken roughly 5 minutes to finish. I processed the same batch with the 970 EVO and it blew my mind, 45 seconds from import to batch adjustment and export. I am so happy with this drive, my photography work will happen so much quicker now.
Attaching the CrystalMark scores for both my old Kingston and the 970 EVO. I was hesitant to spend this much on a drive but now I can't wait to upgrade my desktop with one of these.
该评价的图片


288 个人发现此评论有用

EveryoneIsAnotherYou
5.0 颗星,最多 5 颗星
Breaths new life into old 2013-2014 MacBook Pros that need their SSDs replaced or upgraded
2018年8月1日 -
已在美国亚马逊上发表已确认购买
I have a 15" Retina MacBook Pro that was purchased new (fully loaded) in June 2014 with a 1TB SSD. According to my About This Mac screen, Apple considers this machine a "MacBook Pro (Retina, 15-inch, Late 2013)" and the bottom is stamped Model A1398. A couple months ago, a routine Disk Utility scan revealed corruption on the SSD that couldn't be repaired. I formatted the drive and reloaded macOS High Sierra 10.13.6. A few days after I did this, the factory SSD suddenly quit working completely, and I was unable to boot the machine because it couldn't find a local drive. My neighborhood Mac repair shop couldn't even get the drive to identify itself in a sled attached to another Mac, so something finally went wrong with it at the chip-level, and it failed.
Unfortunately, a 1TB replacement SSD from Apple was $600 plus $100 labor, and OWC's after-market drives suffer terrible reviews about product quality and heat issues. Enter these two parts available on Amazon: the "Samsung 970 EVO 2TB - NVMe PCIe M.2 2280 SSD (MZ-V7E2T0BW)" and the "JSER 12+16pin 2014 2015 Macbook to M.2 NGFF M-Key SSD Convert Card for A1493 A1502 A1465 A1466."
With these two parts, I was able to upgrade to a MUCH FASTER *2TB* SSD for about $800. That's DOUBLE the original storage space and over TRIPLE the speed of the factory Apple SSD for only about $200 more. I've been running this SSD for a few weeks now with no issues. Sleep mode works great, and everything seems to be perfect, just faster. The only thing I haven't been able to test yet is hibernate, because that only kicks in during Sleep mode when the battery gets exceedingly low, and that hasn't happened to my machine yet.
If your MacBook Pro SSD has failed and you're looking at options, consider the parts I mentioned, because they represent a much better value and performance capability than Apple's factory SSD. As long as your MacBook Pro was upgraded to a recent version of High Sierra (10.13.x) or higher, your MacBook Pro will have the firmware update that is needed for this after-market SSD combination work. Check out the attached Black Magic speed results for evidence of the performance you'll get with this combo! Very happy so far, and will post back if I find any issues as time goes on. I'm 3-4 weeks in and everything has been smooth!
Unfortunately, a 1TB replacement SSD from Apple was $600 plus $100 labor, and OWC's after-market drives suffer terrible reviews about product quality and heat issues. Enter these two parts available on Amazon: the "Samsung 970 EVO 2TB - NVMe PCIe M.2 2280 SSD (MZ-V7E2T0BW)" and the "JSER 12+16pin 2014 2015 Macbook to M.2 NGFF M-Key SSD Convert Card for A1493 A1502 A1465 A1466."
With these two parts, I was able to upgrade to a MUCH FASTER *2TB* SSD for about $800. That's DOUBLE the original storage space and over TRIPLE the speed of the factory Apple SSD for only about $200 more. I've been running this SSD for a few weeks now with no issues. Sleep mode works great, and everything seems to be perfect, just faster. The only thing I haven't been able to test yet is hibernate, because that only kicks in during Sleep mode when the battery gets exceedingly low, and that hasn't happened to my machine yet.
If your MacBook Pro SSD has failed and you're looking at options, consider the parts I mentioned, because they represent a much better value and performance capability than Apple's factory SSD. As long as your MacBook Pro was upgraded to a recent version of High Sierra (10.13.x) or higher, your MacBook Pro will have the firmware update that is needed for this after-market SSD combination work. Check out the attached Black Magic speed results for evidence of the performance you'll get with this combo! Very happy so far, and will post back if I find any issues as time goes on. I'm 3-4 weeks in and everything has been smooth!

5.0 颗星,最多 5 颗星
Breaths new life into old 2013-2014 MacBook Pros that need their SSDs replaced or upgraded
2018年8月1日 在美国审核
I have a 15" Retina MacBook Pro that was purchased new (fully loaded) in June 2014 with a 1TB SSD. According to my About This Mac screen, Apple considers this machine a "MacBook Pro (Retina, 15-inch, Late 2013)" and the bottom is stamped Model A1398. A couple months ago, a routine Disk Utility scan revealed corruption on the SSD that couldn't be repaired. I formatted the drive and reloaded macOS High Sierra 10.13.6. A few days after I did this, the factory SSD suddenly quit working completely, and I was unable to boot the machine because it couldn't find a local drive. My neighborhood Mac repair shop couldn't even get the drive to identify itself in a sled attached to another Mac, so something finally went wrong with it at the chip-level, and it failed.2018年8月1日 在美国审核
Unfortunately, a 1TB replacement SSD from Apple was $600 plus $100 labor, and OWC's after-market drives suffer terrible reviews about product quality and heat issues. Enter these two parts available on Amazon: the "Samsung 970 EVO 2TB - NVMe PCIe M.2 2280 SSD (MZ-V7E2T0BW)" and the "JSER 12+16pin 2014 2015 Macbook to M.2 NGFF M-Key SSD Convert Card for A1493 A1502 A1465 A1466."
With these two parts, I was able to upgrade to a MUCH FASTER *2TB* SSD for about $800. That's DOUBLE the original storage space and over TRIPLE the speed of the factory Apple SSD for only about $200 more. I've been running this SSD for a few weeks now with no issues. Sleep mode works great, and everything seems to be perfect, just faster. The only thing I haven't been able to test yet is hibernate, because that only kicks in during Sleep mode when the battery gets exceedingly low, and that hasn't happened to my machine yet.
If your MacBook Pro SSD has failed and you're looking at options, consider the parts I mentioned, because they represent a much better value and performance capability than Apple's factory SSD. As long as your MacBook Pro was upgraded to a recent version of High Sierra (10.13.x) or higher, your MacBook Pro will have the firmware update that is needed for this after-market SSD combination work. Check out the attached Black Magic speed results for evidence of the performance you'll get with this combo! Very happy so far, and will post back if I find any issues as time goes on. I'm 3-4 weeks in and everything has been smooth!
该评价的图片

233 个人发现此评论有用