Not quite as overblown as Kurzwiel's "singularity" (in short, the notion that, among other improbables, we'll soon have conscious machines, notwithstanding that we don't know what consciousness is) but equally based in part upon an overreach; that "genius machines" (GMs) will arise that will raise the game...
Good analysis of that which I had seen for myself as the problem: Masses of people who were once employed farming and transitioned to bolt-tightening on assembly lines are being moved on to... what, exactly? So far so good; the title is well-supported by the content. But clarifying the problem statement does not solve the problem and that leads to shortcomings on two fronts. On the "below average" side of things, the author does some hand-waving and proclaims optimism with no discernible basis or form. It seems to me that all the routes up from the floor entail traits not in evidence in much of the population (not a pejorative; we cannot all be above average simply because half minus one of us are by definition below average) and although most are above average in something, very few are strong in a cocktail of traits that would likely lead to uplifting, and there is no reason to believe that the fraction so gifted will rise. And no indication whatsoever how those not so gifted will survive, much less thrive. We can take comfort in the reasons for the inherent stability of US governance and society (a strength of the book), but it would appear that said stability may be tested as never before.
The other constant theme is the rise of the GMs. Excellent discussion about how and why the greatest chess is played by man-machine combinations. Loss of the third star because of the unconvincing premise that GMs will be developed that will provide opportunity for high-level main-machine collaboration in a variety of technical, social, and even artistic endeavors. I find this a reach much too far. As intractable as the game of chess once appeared to be, it still has precisely defined boundary conditions: starting point, end points, and rules. No real-world endeavor is so blessed. The author also opens the possibility of "solutions" that are comprehensible only to the GMs. As one who is already skeptical of machine-produced "proofs" of mathematical theorems, I have a serious problem with the concept; I invoke the Emperor's Clothes Principal -- if it's incomprehensible to any human, it's incomprehensible. And bogus.
In sum, decent read, no answers; if you're looking for them, move on -- and let me know if you find any.
无需Kindle设备,下载免费Kindle阅读软件,即可在您的手机、电脑及平板电脑上畅享阅读。
请输入您的手机号码,获取Kindle阅读软件的下载链接。
