Bushnell 倍视能 Falcon 133410 双筒望远镜带盒(黑色,7x35 毫米)
Bushnell Falcon 7x35 Binoculars with Case
页面含机器翻译,中文仅供参考,以原文为准
Bushnell Falcon 7x35 Binoculars with Case
|
海外自营
广告
¥286.39¥286.39

促销信息
买满2件售价9.5折优惠
共1个促销
-
买满2件售价9.5折优惠
购买亚马逊海外购活动商品满2件,即可享受售价9.5折优惠。 点击查看全部参加活动商品 由 亚马逊美国 提供。 如何获得促销优惠 (促销说明)
12期7.5%费率,每月仅 ¥25.72 最高12期,多种分期方式可选 了解更多
灵活选择分期付款:结算时,选择花呗分期和您需要的分期数。此处仅为按商品金额(未包括税费)估算的示例,实际金额以结算金额为准。
![]() | 3至12期分期付款 由花呗分期提供 |
分期计划 | 手续费 | 总金额 |
---|---|---|
¥97.66×3期 | ¥6.59 (2.3%) | ¥292.98 |
¥49.88×6期 | ¥12.89 (4.5%) | ¥299.28 |
¥25.72×12期 | ¥21.48 (7.5%) | ¥307.87 |
提升您的购买力
- 全涂层光学器件提供卓越的透光性
- Instafocus 系统可快速专注于移动目标。
- 防滑橡胶防滑垫可确保在各种天气条件下牢牢抓住
- 7 倍放大,自动聚焦波罗棱镜
- 12 毫米眼部放松,5 毫米出瞳瞳孔
- Magnification X Obj Lens: 7 x 35
- Focus System: Center
- Field of View ft@1000yds / m@1000m: 420/140
- Water/Fog Proof : NO
- Weight (oz/g): 21/595
亚马逊海外购
亚马逊海外购-Lodge
Lodge洛极, 来自美国的锅具品牌,拥有百年历史。LODGE 的铸铁锅以价格亲民和坚固耐用著称,LODGE 铸铁锅是清一色的铸铁黑色,粗犷里透露出平实质朴,充满了美式工业风。 >>查看Lodge >>查看海外购厨具店
基本信息
- 制造商是否已停产 : 不是
- 商品尺寸 : 20.32 x 15.88 x 7.62 cm; 600 克
- 制造商 : Bushnell 倍视能
- ASIN : B00004TBLW
- 型号 / 款式 : 133410C
- 亚马逊热销商品排名: 商品里排第22,409名运动户外休闲 (查看运动户外休闲商品销售排行榜)
- 商品里排第168名双筒望远镜
- 用户评分:
买家评论
1.0 颗星,最多 5 颗星
1星,共 5 星
1
买家评价
评分是如何计算的?
在计算总星级评分以及按星级确定的百分比时,我们不使用简单的平均值。相反,我们的系统会考虑评论的最新程度以及评论者是否在亚马逊上购买了该商品。系统还会分析评论,验证评论的可信度。
此商品在美国亚马逊上最有用的商品评论
美国亚马逊:
4.3 颗星,最多 5 颗星
2,455 条评论

Amazon Customer
5.0 颗星,最多 5 颗星
Wonderful binoculars!
2023年1月22日 -
已在美国亚马逊上发表已确认购买
You can see any detail you wish!

daleraby
5.0 颗星,最多 5 颗星
Best General Purpose Set of Binoculars Ever Made For the Money
2022年5月19日 -
已在美国亚马逊上发表已确认购买
Back in the day, I took a college course entitled Summer Birds of Wisconsin. It was basically a bird-watching class with some required knowledge about the things we were watching. The professor at the time was recommending a set of Bushnell 7x35's. I had a pair of 8x50's from my military days, which I soldiered on with, though more often than not, I found my Nikon FM with a 135mm lens to be a better optical instrument.
The classic prismatic 7x35 binoculars are almost as rare as hen's teeth these days, and it is a shame. I lost my old 8x50's over the years and had been making do with another set of 8x50's I purchased from a store where I once worked as I could not seem to even give them away. The Bushnell 7x35 set is half the size and half the weight. The "insta-Focus" feature took a little getting used to, but in the end, I think it is superior to the old-style focusing knob my professor's binoculars had on them. Image quality is excellent.
Yes, there are some plastic parts now that once were made of brass and aluminum, but the quality seems to have been maintained and I have no doubt that they will out-last me. The price-point has also been maintained. I have no doubt that one could purchase a pair of Leitz Trinovids and that they would be a better set in many ways, but not for anything close to the price that these sold for.
If you want to watch birds or maybe hunt or just to watch sailboats out on the Bay of Green Bay, you would be well supplied with these binoculars, and they will not cut grooves in your neck like a pair of 8x50's will. You'll also be much better able to hold them steady. I don't know if they are supposed to be water-proof, but then when it is raining, I'm probably not going out into the field these days anyway.
You got all kinds of money, buy a pair of Steiners or Trinovids. Then again, you could probably buy an old AM General DJ-5 with the money you'd save buying these, That Postal Jeep could then be used to get you back in the firelanes where you could actually use the binoculars.
The classic prismatic 7x35 binoculars are almost as rare as hen's teeth these days, and it is a shame. I lost my old 8x50's over the years and had been making do with another set of 8x50's I purchased from a store where I once worked as I could not seem to even give them away. The Bushnell 7x35 set is half the size and half the weight. The "insta-Focus" feature took a little getting used to, but in the end, I think it is superior to the old-style focusing knob my professor's binoculars had on them. Image quality is excellent.
Yes, there are some plastic parts now that once were made of brass and aluminum, but the quality seems to have been maintained and I have no doubt that they will out-last me. The price-point has also been maintained. I have no doubt that one could purchase a pair of Leitz Trinovids and that they would be a better set in many ways, but not for anything close to the price that these sold for.
If you want to watch birds or maybe hunt or just to watch sailboats out on the Bay of Green Bay, you would be well supplied with these binoculars, and they will not cut grooves in your neck like a pair of 8x50's will. You'll also be much better able to hold them steady. I don't know if they are supposed to be water-proof, but then when it is raining, I'm probably not going out into the field these days anyway.
You got all kinds of money, buy a pair of Steiners or Trinovids. Then again, you could probably buy an old AM General DJ-5 with the money you'd save buying these, That Postal Jeep could then be used to get you back in the firelanes where you could actually use the binoculars.
13 个人发现此评论有用

Cindy C
5.0 颗星,最多 5 颗星
Great Customer service and product
2022年12月10日 -
已在美国亚马逊上发表已确认购买
This is a gift and when my tracking showed delivered but I didn't get anything. Also showed delivered to the wrong city I live in, customer service helped right away and send me out another one. I was worked as this is for a Christmas party. Arrived quickly and good quality. Bushnell has great products. And the Customer service was A+++
3 个人发现此评论有用

Sam Vimes
3.0 颗星,最多 5 颗星
A Comparative Analysis of Leading Binoculars
2012年9月15日 -
已在美国亚马逊上发表已确认购买
After years of suffering with dark, weak, wobbly binoculars (thank you, Magnacraft), I found myself needing two types: the best quality I could find (1) at any weight but under $250 for use within a drive of home (home binocs), and (2) under 10 oz, easy to travel with in tour groups, simple for impatient family members, and ideal for night concerts and day baseball games (travel binocs).
After studying reviews and comments thoroughly, I concluded there are brilliant experts commenting regularly on Amazon - much more insightful than the professional reviewers who focus on expensive, heavy devices purchased by others of their ilk. From my fellow consumers' insights, I purchased 11 binoculars with at least 70% five-star ratings that fit my general specifications for home or travel.
GENERAL CONCLUSIONS. After exhaustive examination - reading a DVD box at 46 feet, finding individual cattle from a moving minivan, and watching stars and planets in my backyard - I concluded the essential attributes for binoculars across categories are:
(A) Plenty of Light brought to your eye. Light is determined by the diameter of the light-gathering lens divided by the magnification. In other words, an 8x42 pair has a ratio of 5.25 and produces LOTS of light, while a 10x21 pair has a ratio of 2.1 and always appear dark. Conclusion: About 3.0 is adequate and the best available for compact binoculars.
(B) Good Stability of View. View stability depends on (i) the degrees of field of vision (can you find what you are looking for), (ii) the depth of visibility (do you have to refocus for every few feet of depth), and (iii) wobble (which is itself determined by (i) and (ii)). Conclusion: field of vision is rarely as broad as advertised, depth of visibility depends on the lens quality and you just have to check it out, and any binoc with a magnification of 10 or higher proved to have poor stability of view without a tripod, at least for me. There is a big difference between 8x and 10x, particularly below a 42 lens diameter.
SPECIFIC CONCLUSIONS. (Home Binoculars) The best Home Binoc was the Nikon Monarch ATM 8x42, and it outperformed all other 10 by a wide margin. I could read a DVD box at 46 feet, keep a broad and stable view to find the cow with three white spots while bouncing in a minivan, and find and watch Mars. At 24 oz, it's too big for constant lugging, but oh what a treat. At $230, it was comparable in price to the Vixen 14502 Foresta 8x42 and the Bushnell Ultra HD 8x42, but it performed noticeably better, particularly on view stability. Several cheaper, heavy models under $100 had cloudy lens.
(Travel Binoculars) The Pentax 8x25 UCF XII and the Olympus 8x25 PCI were best in class, although the Pentax had less wobble, more clarity while the Olympus provided more light and more accurate color tones, but a smaller field of vision. (Forget finding the cow, but if you found it, you could count its ear hairs at dusk). Both were 10 oz, and about $65; the Pentax, which gets slightly better overall reviews, is larger but felt better in my hand. Small hands, viewing at dusk, standing still = Olympus. Larger hands, viewing in daylight, on a bus = Pentax. Lastly, the itty bitty Olympus 7x21 PC III at 7 oz in metallic blue is adorable and $24 (refurbished), with fantastic clarity and ease of use, but a very narrow field of vision, despite its 7.5% claim.
So what did we do? I decided to travel with the heavy Nikon Monarch, but kept the Pentax 8x25 in reserve. Different members of my family preferred the Pentax 8x25, the Olympus 8x25, and the Olympus 7x21, each predictably on the basis of the decision maker's age, size, and goals. None showed any interest in the other six binocs.
As a final note, Beware of imperfection and non-Amazon sellers. Two of the 11 binocs arrived with lens imperfections. The heavy Bushnell Falcon (7x36) at $30 had a cloudy lens, and Amazon accepted the return promptly. The lightweight but expensive Nikon Travelite 10x25, already with little light and a small field of vision, had a defective lens, making it darker. The vendor wanted me to pay shipping in both directions plus a restocking fee to return the defective item.
Good luck with your decision. I hope my odyssey was helpful to you.
After studying reviews and comments thoroughly, I concluded there are brilliant experts commenting regularly on Amazon - much more insightful than the professional reviewers who focus on expensive, heavy devices purchased by others of their ilk. From my fellow consumers' insights, I purchased 11 binoculars with at least 70% five-star ratings that fit my general specifications for home or travel.
GENERAL CONCLUSIONS. After exhaustive examination - reading a DVD box at 46 feet, finding individual cattle from a moving minivan, and watching stars and planets in my backyard - I concluded the essential attributes for binoculars across categories are:
(A) Plenty of Light brought to your eye. Light is determined by the diameter of the light-gathering lens divided by the magnification. In other words, an 8x42 pair has a ratio of 5.25 and produces LOTS of light, while a 10x21 pair has a ratio of 2.1 and always appear dark. Conclusion: About 3.0 is adequate and the best available for compact binoculars.
(B) Good Stability of View. View stability depends on (i) the degrees of field of vision (can you find what you are looking for), (ii) the depth of visibility (do you have to refocus for every few feet of depth), and (iii) wobble (which is itself determined by (i) and (ii)). Conclusion: field of vision is rarely as broad as advertised, depth of visibility depends on the lens quality and you just have to check it out, and any binoc with a magnification of 10 or higher proved to have poor stability of view without a tripod, at least for me. There is a big difference between 8x and 10x, particularly below a 42 lens diameter.
SPECIFIC CONCLUSIONS. (Home Binoculars) The best Home Binoc was the Nikon Monarch ATM 8x42, and it outperformed all other 10 by a wide margin. I could read a DVD box at 46 feet, keep a broad and stable view to find the cow with three white spots while bouncing in a minivan, and find and watch Mars. At 24 oz, it's too big for constant lugging, but oh what a treat. At $230, it was comparable in price to the Vixen 14502 Foresta 8x42 and the Bushnell Ultra HD 8x42, but it performed noticeably better, particularly on view stability. Several cheaper, heavy models under $100 had cloudy lens.
(Travel Binoculars) The Pentax 8x25 UCF XII and the Olympus 8x25 PCI were best in class, although the Pentax had less wobble, more clarity while the Olympus provided more light and more accurate color tones, but a smaller field of vision. (Forget finding the cow, but if you found it, you could count its ear hairs at dusk). Both were 10 oz, and about $65; the Pentax, which gets slightly better overall reviews, is larger but felt better in my hand. Small hands, viewing at dusk, standing still = Olympus. Larger hands, viewing in daylight, on a bus = Pentax. Lastly, the itty bitty Olympus 7x21 PC III at 7 oz in metallic blue is adorable and $24 (refurbished), with fantastic clarity and ease of use, but a very narrow field of vision, despite its 7.5% claim.
So what did we do? I decided to travel with the heavy Nikon Monarch, but kept the Pentax 8x25 in reserve. Different members of my family preferred the Pentax 8x25, the Olympus 8x25, and the Olympus 7x21, each predictably on the basis of the decision maker's age, size, and goals. None showed any interest in the other six binocs.
As a final note, Beware of imperfection and non-Amazon sellers. Two of the 11 binocs arrived with lens imperfections. The heavy Bushnell Falcon (7x36) at $30 had a cloudy lens, and Amazon accepted the return promptly. The lightweight but expensive Nikon Travelite 10x25, already with little light and a small field of vision, had a defective lens, making it darker. The vendor wanted me to pay shipping in both directions plus a restocking fee to return the defective item.
Good luck with your decision. I hope my odyssey was helpful to you.
624 个人发现此评论有用

Nicole Reyes González
5.0 颗星,最多 5 颗星
Good
2022年12月13日 -
已在美国亚马逊上发表已确认购买
Pretty good for trips, good magnification. Images are awesome! Good for the price!