This is a book about things left untold. About perennial truths grand and small, imprisoned in the catacombs of social pretense, feel-good lies and ideological projections that line up the modern human hive. More than a book, Nihilism is as an act of courage, both in its ambitious philosophical scope and willingness to take on difficult conversations about the emperor’s not-so-new clothes.
Animated by the transcendentalist spirit of ancient traditions and most notably, by Friedrich Nietzsche’s esoteric moral philosophy, this collection of essays sets out to help the contemplative human make sense of life among 21st century ruins - and love it all, nonetheless. For skeptics who look out the window to point out there are no ruins, Nihilism brilliantly excoriates our modern condition with its mazes of institutionalized confusion and deception, to expose the ruins beyond the shadow of a doubt.
The content is likely to unsettle, possibly upset, many profiles. These include literal, linear and categorical thinkers; individualists, materialists, and egalitarians; obtuse puritans, avowed hedonists and complacent fatalists; congenital malcontents, try-hard iconoclasts and neurotics of all stripes; not to be forgotten - popularity seekers and practitioners of self-deception such as the all too familiar auto-congratulatory altruists among us.
Unfortunately, this covers a massive chunk of the modern population. While a minority are sure to find their homecoming in these incisive articulations, it is a testament to the book’s life-affirming message that the author’s voice never despairs of finding listeners among the majority, without the slightest attempt to ‘educate’ or convert. This sets him apart from more melancholy thinkers like Roger Scruton with whom he shares many views on the modern predicament.
Though not addressed to an audience of trained philosophers, this is a philosophical project. The target audience remains unabashedly ‘select’ in that a certain level of appreciation for subtlety and complexity, and a penchant for spirituality and esthetics are expected from the reader. Yet one would be fatally wrong to anticipate impenetrable bloviations, pretentious jargon or razzle-dazzle stylistics (or statistics). In fact, the absence of academic pedantry and writer vanity is striking. Straightforward writing that doesn’t shy away from common parlance where needed, is replete with meaningful explanations and relatable examples, which renders abstract philosophical concepts instantly accessible. Most importantly, each essay captivates through unusual depth of observation and a palpable passion for wisdom and truth. Reflections on a wide range of psychological and socio-political topics develop into an overarching vector that makes up the philosophical backbone of the book: nihilism --> realism --> idealism --> transcendentalism.
Nihilism is a mature philosophy the author is careful to divorce from ‘Kiddie-Nihilism.’ This is the famous philosophical caricature often taken as license to throw tantrums of the existentialist sort leading to rationalization of destructive juvenile behavior. If there is no objective ground for moral truth and no inherent meaning, the thinking goes, why not be the cool cynical anarchist next door who indulges in personal comforts at the expense of all else?
Mature nihilism steers us away from this error. Instead, by accepting a lack of inherent meaning we clear the mind of all anthropomorphic belief so we can discipline it, not depress it. This is mental hygiene necessary for maximizing life prospects. Just as one cannot clearly see the potential of a floor plan when the house is full of furniture, dirt and clutter, it is difficult to make out reality when most of it is littered with solipsistic belief. By cleaning up, we can extricate Reality from social reality and its artifices.
Nihilism sets the stage for realism - the habit of paying attention to natural forces and perennial patterns. Instead of engaging in futile attempts to deny, change or escape them through projection and prescription (the irresistible ‘all men have been created equal’ comes to mind), we effectively adapt to patterns of reality over the long-term and see them as basis for valuation and moral code. If we are not interested in reality - reality is interested in us (consequentialism).
This graduates us to idealism - a Platonic mindset that values the endurable idea over the immediately tangible. Paradoxically, this mindset compels us to manifest ideas in the material realm as conscious creators and long-term planners. It is how we get reliable desirables: functional civilization, loving families, technology, ethics, a sense of belonging, and the delights of beauty that may flow from a symphony, a cathedral or simply a life well lived. Without idealism, we are doomed to live chaotically, as permanently vulnerable, reactive beings. Disorganization emerges as the root of all evil.
Transcendentalism completes the vector by bringing us the good news of salvation. The bad news for our inner individualist is that it doesn’t involve absolution from personal suffering. Neither does it promise redemption in an idealized Afterlife. We can only be ‘saved’ by rejecting the ‘weeping mentality’ and the need for personal control. In the vein of Nietzsche’s Amor Fati, we accept joy and suffering as inextricable facets of the same universal ‘meta-good’ in which we all play a minuscule part. Far from evading empathy or compassion for the human condition, this framework seeks to free us from the tyranny of personal desire, inferiority complexes, Jungian shadows and mortal fears, by turning them irrelevant. When we embrace the large scheme of things instead of ego-driven passions, the beauty of life - as it is - reveals itself in the here and now, in what was before us, and what will come when we are no more.
While the book is brimming with provocative topics as varied as the effectiveness of education, the limits of communication, the loss of belief in beauty or the logics of submission to grotesque circumstances - a vigorous rejection of egalitarianism remains central to the book’s mission. A great deal of misery, instead of promised utopias, results from the modern hive’s insistence on equality - the most alluring and fanatical doctrine of all times. Collectivism is not the opposite of individualism, as commonly believed, but the same ‘me-first’ mentality manifested in a more cowardly form. Humans bind in crowds to make self-serving demands, cloaking selfishness in altruistic concern for all (crowdism). The distinction between genuine care for others as an act of improving community and competitive altruism echoes Paul Woodruff’s warning of impostor virtues - illusions that make us feel good about doing bad or wrong things.
Like all acts of honesty, the project is not without its vulnerable points. Ontological quibbles over the subjective nature of Reality itself, not just social reality, are bound to persist. Although the author makes a compelling case for transcendentalism as the ultimate expression of human good, this leaves the reader craving further expansion on the pragmatics of anthropocentric transgression. How do humans “forgive their world for the degree of suffering and eventual death?” What sets apart those who can become intoxicated with life itself from those who keep their sober distance? A touch of Tolstoyan-Dostoevskyan grapple with the role of consciousness, self-awareness and sentiment in how the ego copes with the forces of cosmic randomness and mystery, could have rescued the work from possible perceptions of cruel optimism, as misguided as they would be. Finally, as the sequence of essays doesn’t reflect any particular order, this may obscure the logical development of the book’s overarching philosophy.
In sum, five stars for a hidden gem by a serious thinker. If minds could enter beauty pageants, this one would likely make the final rounds; and while it might not be the one with the World Peace platform, it could go a long way in delivering the Inner kind. Or an Earthquake. Your mileage may vary.

下载免费的 Kindle 阅读软件,即可立即在智能手机、平板电脑或电脑上阅读 Kindle 电子书 - 无需 Kindle 设备。了解更多信息
使用 Kindle 网页版即时在浏览器上阅读。
使用手机摄像头 - 扫描以下代码并下载 Kindle 阅读软件。

前翻 后翻
【亚马逊图书】Nihilism: A Philosophy Based in Nothingness and Eternity 平装
英语版本
123
- 语言英语
- 出版社Manticore Press
- 尺寸15.24 x 1.6 x 22.86 cm
- ISBN-100994595832
- ISBN-13978-0994595836
无需Kindle设备,下载免费Kindle阅读软件,即可在您的手机、电脑及平板电脑上畅享阅读。
基本信息
- 语言 : 英语
- ISBN : 0994595832
- 品牌 : Manticore Press
- 尺寸 : 15.24 x 1.6 x 22.86 cm
- 用户评分:
无买家评论
5 星 (0%) |
|
0% |
4 星 (0%) |
|
0% |
3 星 (0%) |
|
0% |
2 星 (0%) |
|
0% |
1 星 (0%) |
|
0% |
评分是如何计算的?
在计算总星级评分以及按星级确定的百分比时,我们不使用简单的平均值。相反,我们的系统会考虑评论的最新程度以及评论者是否在亚马逊上购买了该商品。系统还会分析评论,验证评论的可信度。
此商品在美国亚马逊上最有用的商品评论
美国亚马逊:
3.3 颗星,最多 5 颗星
24 条评论

Écume de Mer
5.0 颗星,最多 5 颗星
Hidden Gem - Unmasking Dying Civilization
2020年5月4日 -
已在美国亚马逊上发表已确认购买
10 个人发现此评论有用

Peter H.
5.0 颗星,最多 5 颗星
Review and Analysis of Nihilism
2016年9月27日 -
已在美国亚马逊上发表已确认购买
Brett Stevens’ "Nihilism: A Philosophy Based In Nothingness And Eternity" serves as both an attempt to clarify a long misunderstood term — nihilism — while also critiquing the caricature of nihilists as fatalists. Further, Stevens attempts to reinvigorate the realism-idealism debate with novel insights into the meaning of both terms. What follows is not simply a generic Amazon.com review, but rather a critical analysis of Stevens’ arguments…so if you’re ready to take the plunge, read on.
--
"Nihilism: A Philosophy Based In Nothingness And Eternity" is a collection of Stevens’ essays that are divided up into three chapters: Nihilism, Realism, and Transcendentalism. Each chapter features a collection of essays, not any chronological order, that relate to the overall theme of the chapter. Before we get into the nitty-gritty analysis, I would like to note a few things. First, and most importantly, is that I came at "Nihilism" from a stricter philosophical standpoint than I believe Stevens intended for readers to. More specifically, being trained as a philosopher I look for specific, nuanced, and in-depth arguments to support a point. Stevens, however, takes a slightly different approach arguing that pragmatism tends to trump theory when he says “the pragmatic effects of nihilist belief are more important than detailed philosophical ‘proofs'"(54). As such, I tend to agree with about 50% of what Stevens says while finding other parts lacking in explication. All that is not designed to make a normative judgement, however; instead I wish to recognize my biases before going any further. Second, the fact that the essays are not presented in chronological order makes it slightly difficult to trace the evolution of Stevens’ thought and thus a lot of the same material, specifically in the first chapter, is retreaded without further expansion. In other words, essay #1 might define nihilism in a significantly more robust way than essay #3 does which, ultimately, makes tracing the changes in Stevens’ thinking difficult. Given that, this review will attempt to aggregate Stevens’ views and distill the main ideas.
==Read my complete review and analysis at [...]
--
"Nihilism: A Philosophy Based In Nothingness And Eternity" is a collection of Stevens’ essays that are divided up into three chapters: Nihilism, Realism, and Transcendentalism. Each chapter features a collection of essays, not any chronological order, that relate to the overall theme of the chapter. Before we get into the nitty-gritty analysis, I would like to note a few things. First, and most importantly, is that I came at "Nihilism" from a stricter philosophical standpoint than I believe Stevens intended for readers to. More specifically, being trained as a philosopher I look for specific, nuanced, and in-depth arguments to support a point. Stevens, however, takes a slightly different approach arguing that pragmatism tends to trump theory when he says “the pragmatic effects of nihilist belief are more important than detailed philosophical ‘proofs'"(54). As such, I tend to agree with about 50% of what Stevens says while finding other parts lacking in explication. All that is not designed to make a normative judgement, however; instead I wish to recognize my biases before going any further. Second, the fact that the essays are not presented in chronological order makes it slightly difficult to trace the evolution of Stevens’ thought and thus a lot of the same material, specifically in the first chapter, is retreaded without further expansion. In other words, essay #1 might define nihilism in a significantly more robust way than essay #3 does which, ultimately, makes tracing the changes in Stevens’ thinking difficult. Given that, this review will attempt to aggregate Stevens’ views and distill the main ideas.
==Read my complete review and analysis at [...]
17 个人发现此评论有用

Southpaw68
4.0 颗星,最多 5 颗星
Weird Uncle Advice
2019年8月11日 -
已在美国亚马逊上发表已确认购买
Stevens explains the difference between nihilism and fatalism well. The former he views as positive and latter negative. He says he knows what reality is and makes his decisions on that, although our views of what reality is are subjective and limited to the five senses. He will follow his preferences in life realizing that there is no ultimate truth.
Stevens scores low on the empathy and sentimentality scale. He is full of weird uncle/hard dad advice about the world and has contempt for his inferiors. He has read too much Nietzsche and listened to too much death metal. He advocates eliminating people with an IQ under a 100 to save the environment. Nature seems to be this nazi that naturally should select the strongest and eliminate the weakest. Stevens may long for the days of the ice age when Odin roamed the earth and only the strong and smart survived. If you can get past these disturbing traits, this book is for you.
Stevens scores low on the empathy and sentimentality scale. He is full of weird uncle/hard dad advice about the world and has contempt for his inferiors. He has read too much Nietzsche and listened to too much death metal. He advocates eliminating people with an IQ under a 100 to save the environment. Nature seems to be this nazi that naturally should select the strongest and eliminate the weakest. Stevens may long for the days of the ice age when Odin roamed the earth and only the strong and smart survived. If you can get past these disturbing traits, this book is for you.
18 个人发现此评论有用