Still reading, very poorly edited and the introduction re occurs about 4 or 5 times. The content so far is very good, even great but seems to contain some paragraphs that are nothing but word count filler. Still I find the content driving me to give it 4 stars and as I close in on the end of the book I still give it 4 stars.
One note to the author/s would be: Frozen lakes are thickest in the middle and thinner towards the shores, might seem counter intuitive but its true.
Reverse Deception: Organized Cyber Threat Counter-Exploitation (英语) 平装
显示所有 格式和版本 隐藏其他格式和版本
|5 星 (0%)||0%|
|4 星 (0%)||0%|
|3 星 (0%)||0%|
|2 星 (0%)||0%|
|1 星 (0%)||0%|
美国亚马逊： 18 条评论
Great content, needs a serious editor but a worthy edition2014年8月7日 - 已在美国亚马逊上发表
Deception - but on who?2019年4月23日 - 已在美国亚马逊上发表
I read parts of this book several years ago. I just remember feeling like the main body of the book was not what the title led me to believe. Some highlights were of interest but for the most part it was not an enjoyable read.
Read this.2016年2月4日 - 已在美国亚马逊上发表
I have been an IT professional for 17 years. Though not in security, I pride myself in being well rounded, and found Reverse Deception helpful in that endeavor. If I was a CIO, I would make this a must read for the people in my organization. This is not just for tech geeks, but the law department as well.
Great Information for Non-techies, Too2012年8月2日 - 已在美国亚马逊上发表
Reverse Deception earns my highest rating. As a technically challenged researcher, Reverse Deception provides multiple levels of adaptive understanding even I can enjoy. Surprisingly witty, the authors parse extremely complex topics into byte-size consumable product for easy consumption. The authors built in enough scenarios and vignettes to indicate they have real-world experiences in cyber and counter-espionage. I especially appreciate how Reverse Deception dissects Operation Aurora as an example of how even the best can be fooled. I highly recommend Reverse Deception as mandatory reading for intelligence professionals--techie or not.